GlobalSA

Sub Judice or Subterfuge? Parliament Tests Limits of Oversight

Jul 19, 2025 · 4 min read

Share Post

By Constitutional Law Analyst

Article image

Lawmakers clash over whether judicial processes should constrain corruption probes

Rule 89 Controversy

Initial legal opinions cautioned that National Assembly Rule 89 (limiting discussion of court matters) could constrain parliamentary action. However, legal services ultimately advised this shouldn't prevent oversight: 'The sub judice rule mustn't hamper constitutional duties.'

Case Law Precedents

Parliament's lawyers cited:

  • De Lille v Speaker (1998): Affirmed Parliament's investigative powers
  • Economic Freedom Fighters v Speaker(2022): Upheld oversight as distinct from judicial functions

Opposition Pushback

DA MP Werner Horn rejected cautious approach: 'We need legal findings, not opinions. Attorneys should stake their licenses on these recommendations.' ANC members countered that reckless actions could jeopardize criminal cases.

Related Articles

Browse More Categories